Comments on: Immoral or Scandalous Matter? http://tacticalip.com/2009/10/13/immoral-or-scandalous-matter/ Tactically Relevant. Patently Entertaining. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:19:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Classic Rewind: Air-O-Matic’s claim of trademark infringement doesn’t pass the smell test | TacticalIP.com http://tacticalip.com/2009/10/13/immoral-or-scandalous-matter/#comment-37 Classic Rewind: Air-O-Matic’s claim of trademark infringement doesn’t pass the smell test | TacticalIP.com Sun, 25 Oct 2009 04:09:22 +0000 http://tacticalip.com/?p=137#comment-37 [...] Who’s to say that the examining attorney won’t declare the mark "scandalous," because it is a vulgar reference to bodily functions?  Even if the examining attorney [...] [...] Who’s to say that the examining attorney won’t declare the mark "scandalous," because it is a vulgar reference to bodily functions?  Even if the examining attorney [...]

]]> By: Air-O-Matic’s claim of trademark infringement doesn’t pass the smell test « GaneshaFish.com http://tacticalip.com/2009/10/13/immoral-or-scandalous-matter/#comment-36 Air-O-Matic’s claim of trademark infringement doesn’t pass the smell test « GaneshaFish.com Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:59:45 +0000 http://tacticalip.com/?p=137#comment-36 [...] Who’s to say that the examining attorney won’t declare the mark "scandalous," because it is a vulgar reference to bodily functions?  Even if the examining attorney [...] [...] Who’s to say that the examining attorney won’t declare the mark "scandalous," because it is a vulgar reference to bodily functions?  Even if the examining attorney [...]

]]>