<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Patentable?&#160; A Brief Background on Bilski and Where We Are Now.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalip.com/2009/11/16/what-is-patentable-a-brief-background-on-bilski-and-where-we-are-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/11/16/what-is-patentable-a-brief-background-on-bilski-and-where-we-are-now/</link>
	<description>Tactically Relevant. Patently Entertaining.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE ROADMAP TO THE SUPREME COURT FOR BERNARD BILSKI &#124; TacticalIP.com</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/11/16/what-is-patentable-a-brief-background-on-bilski-and-where-we-are-now/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>THE ROADMAP TO THE SUPREME COURT FOR BERNARD BILSKI &#124; TacticalIP.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=420#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BILSKI IS FINALLY DECIDED AND NOW WE HAVE SOME REAL QUESTIONS &#124; TacticalIP.com</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/11/16/what-is-patentable-a-brief-background-on-bilski-and-where-we-are-now/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>BILSKI IS FINALLY DECIDED AND NOW WE HAVE SOME REAL QUESTIONS &#124; TacticalIP.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=420#comment-222</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Bilski Prediction &#124; TacticalIP.com</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/11/16/what-is-patentable-a-brief-background-on-bilski-and-where-we-are-now/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>My Bilski Prediction &#124; TacticalIP.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=420#comment-204</guid>
		<description>[...] For more information on the original holding by the Federal Circuit, please check out our previous post.&#160; For some information on the oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court, please check out our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For more information on the original holding by the Federal Circuit, please check out our previous post.&nbsp; For some information on the oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court, please check out our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Precedential Software Decision from the Board of Patent Appeals and Inteferences &#124; TacticalIP.com</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/11/16/what-is-patentable-a-brief-background-on-bilski-and-where-we-are-now/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>New Precedential Software Decision from the Board of Patent Appeals and Inteferences &#124; TacticalIP.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=420#comment-139</guid>
		<description>[...] we are anxiously awaiting the decision from the U.S. Supreme Court in the Bilski case (coverage here and here).&#160; This attorney, for one, is very much so wondering what will happen to software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we are anxiously awaiting the decision from the U.S. Supreme Court in the Bilski case (coverage here and here).&nbsp; This attorney, for one, is very much so wondering what will happen to software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilski Part Deux:&#160; Hilarity Ensues During Supreme Court Oral Arguments &#124; TacticalIP.com</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/11/16/what-is-patentable-a-brief-background-on-bilski-and-where-we-are-now/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilski Part Deux:&#160; Hilarity Ensues During Supreme Court Oral Arguments &#124; TacticalIP.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=420#comment-87</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week we reported that the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on In re Bilski.&#160; Since the Bilski case can have some major ramifications on determining the types of patentable subject matter, we wanted to take a deeper dive into what was actually discussed at the hearing.&#160; What we found was that the Supreme Court Justices presented several entertaining scenarios during the oral arguments. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week we reported that the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on In re Bilski.&nbsp; Since the Bilski case can have some major ramifications on determining the types of patentable subject matter, we wanted to take a deeper dive into what was actually discussed at the hearing.&nbsp; What we found was that the Supreme Court Justices presented several entertaining scenarios during the oral arguments. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

