<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent Language: &#8220;The Present Invention&#8221; versus &#8220;An Embodiment of the Present Invention&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalip.com/2009/11/25/patent-language-the-present-invention-versus-an-embodiment-of-the-present-invention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/11/25/patent-language-the-present-invention-versus-an-embodiment-of-the-present-invention/</link>
	<description>Tactically Relevant. Patently Entertaining.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Loven</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2009/11/25/patent-language-the-present-invention-versus-an-embodiment-of-the-present-invention/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Loven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=507#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Thanks for an admirably clear explanation of the position.  UK Patent Attorneys have traditionally followed the &quot;embodiment of the invention&quot; approach, because of the slightly different way that &quot;inventive step&quot; is considered here in the UK and Europe, but it is good to have it reinforced that this is also good practice for the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for an admirably clear explanation of the position.  UK Patent Attorneys have traditionally followed the &#8220;embodiment of the invention&#8221; approach, because of the slightly different way that &#8220;inventive step&#8221; is considered here in the UK and Europe, but it is good to have it reinforced that this is also good practice for the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

