<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Southern Cal beats up on South Carolina&#8230; in a trademark dispute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tacticalip.com/2010/01/25/southern-cal-beats-up-on-south-carolina-in-a-trademark-dispute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tacticalip.com/2010/01/25/southern-cal-beats-up-on-south-carolina-in-a-trademark-dispute/</link>
	<description>Tactically Relevant. Patently Entertaining.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2010/01/25/southern-cal-beats-up-on-south-carolina-in-a-trademark-dispute/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=737#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Good article--this case has inevitable humorous overtones because of the subject matter...

I have also blogged on this case at http://www.mcbride-law.com/2010/01/21/southern-cal-beats-south-carolina-in-trademark-case/ 

What I found interesting was the court focused on the likelihood that some consumers would &quot;exercise little care in making purchases,&quot; and, I guess, would become confused as to which school they were actually supporting.

One can just see the script SC hats popping up all over LA, but for this ruling!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article&#8211;this case has inevitable humorous overtones because of the subject matter&#8230;</p>
<p>I have also blogged on this case at <a href="http://www.mcbride-law.com/2010/01/21/southern-cal-beats-south-carolina-in-trademark-case/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mcbride-law.com/2010/01/21/southern-cal-beats-south-carolina-in-trademark-case/</a> </p>
<p>What I found interesting was the court focused on the likelihood that some consumers would &#8220;exercise little care in making purchases,&#8221; and, I guess, would become confused as to which school they were actually supporting.</p>
<p>One can just see the script SC hats popping up all over LA, but for this ruling!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KWW</title>
		<link>http://tacticalip.com/2010/01/25/southern-cal-beats-up-on-south-carolina-in-a-trademark-dispute/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>KWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalip.com/?p=737#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Personal feelings aside, this case really shows the power of the standard word mark.  If Southern Cal. had a stylized mark registration or claimed color, then this may have come out a different way.  Maybe I should propose amendments to the Lanham Act that force universities to claim their official colors in trademark apps...  j/k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personal feelings aside, this case really shows the power of the standard word mark.  If Southern Cal. had a stylized mark registration or claimed color, then this may have come out a different way.  Maybe I should propose amendments to the Lanham Act that force universities to claim their official colors in trademark apps&#8230;  j/k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

