Posts Tagged ‘constitution’

By Daniel Davidson

You may be familiar with the late legend Bob Marley.  You may have even seen a shirt or two that display his familiar face.  Fortunately for the Marley family, you will not be seeing him on any apparel sold by the company Avela.

Avela, a Nevada company, is owned by Leo Valencia, who created toys and shirts that displayed the reggae singer’s likeness.  Unfortunately, it was without the authorization of Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Ltd. and Zion Rootswear, the companies that Mr. Marley’s heirs run his empire under.  This, as I hope we are all beginning to understand, is not permissible, in most cases, under U.S. Copyright Code.

Avela and Mr. Valencia were stuck with a $300,000 bill for their unauthorized use of the likeness from a U.S. Federal Court and hopefully an injunction will follow that keeps Bob Marley’s off of bobble heads seeing that his children do not want to see their father portrayed in this manner.

Kudos to the Marley family on this victory.  I wouldn’t mind seeing a growing trend of victories for the family since the punch to the stomach they received in a previous copyright case.  You can read about it in an article I wrote here.

If Avela is looking for a substitute face, mine is available for printing on anything.

Gravatar Iconby Mark Malek

light bulbPatent rights are derived from the U.S. Constitution.  Many people mistakenly call patents rights a monopoly, but that isn’t exactly accurate.  Patent rights are not a true monopoly, as the Government does not grant you a right to make something.  Instead, the right granted allows the patent holder to exclude others from making, using, selling or offering to sell the invention that is protected by the patent.  In most cases, i.e., utility patents, that right lasts for 20 years from the date the application is filed.  For simplicity, I will not get into the patent term adjustments or other patent rights that may not last as long as the utility patent rights, e.g., design patents.

The patent system is intended to reward innovation.  Any inventor out there that has tried to bring their product to market knows how long it takes and the cost involved in bringing their invention to market.  Even the simplest of inventions can cost tens of thousands of dollars to bring to market.  This is true when it comes to mechanical inventions, but especially true in the pharmaceutical industry.  We always hear critics that vilify the pharmaceutical companies say that their drugs shouldn’t be so expensive because it only costs a penny to make each pill.  That’s not exactly accurate.  Sure, pill number 2 – 10,000 only costs a penny each, but that first pill had a cost in the millions (and sometimes billions) in research and development costs.  An often-cited research study on the subject put the number north of $800 million in 2003.  Shouldn’t any inventor that has put forth the time to develop their invention be allowed to recover their costs and profit from their innovation without others merely copying them?  The answer to that question is obvious.

Read more...

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 07, 2012

Bad Behavior has blocked 1604 access attempts in the last 7 days.