Posts Tagged ‘usa network’

Aaron Thalwitzer

One of the most individuals from the new Star Wars movies lost his lawsuit against USA Network. Hayden Christensen (who played the fictionalized version of Darth Vader) and his brother Tove (seriously?) sued USA over rights to the apparently popular show Royal Pains. Hayden and Tove claim they met with USA in 2005 to pitch their idea for a show called Housecall about a “concierge” doctor to fancy-pants Hollywood-types. USA said thanks but no thanks and that was that.

Then, in 2009, Royal Pains, a show about a “concierge” doctor to fancy-pants Northeast Coast-types. The brothers sued USA for stealing their idea. They claim that USA knew when they met that it was a pitch meeting and that the bros intended to sell the ideas or be employed in the production of a series based on the ideas. The suit alleges several causes of action, including unfair competition, but does not include copyright infringement. They allege damages of “millions of dollars”. The Christensens say that USA never mentioned that it had a nearly identical show in development at the same time.

Well, the district court judge held that their claims are unsubstantiated and concern “materials that are not copyrightable, such as ideas.”

The Onion AV Club may have the real scoop:

… we all know the real reason for the judge’s dismissal: Seething hatred of the Star Wars prequels and, perhaps more importantly, knee-jerk reaction to “Tove,” which sounds like the name of a spoiled little Norse prince, his moon-face perpetually covered in scone crumbs and smears of blackberry jam, who tortures stray whelps for his own amusement. “Come to supper, Tove!” Ugh. We’d dismiss it too.

Dear Television Writers and Producers:

Let me start off by saying that I am a huge fan of television and that I particularly enjoy the pervasive one-hour episodic drama genre.  Cop and lawyer shows are my absolute favorite, despite the fact that they often present embellishments and minor procedural inaccuracies.  One of the only things that a legal education is guaranteed to do is suck all of the enjoyment out of watching courtroom shows that play it fast and loose with the formalities of litigation, but I’ve learned to ignore most of the discomfort that comes from watching a make-believe prosecutor present character evidence in his case-in-chief.  I hardly cringe anymore when I hear scripted dialog about “robbing” a house or “murdering” an animal.  I am writing today, however, to tell you of a related faux pas that I haven’t been able to ignore.

rick-castle

“Are you saying that our show is unoriginal?”

As I’m sure you are aware, a subclass of the traditional police show has been popping up with greater frequency in recent years.  The basic premise for these shows is this:  A civilian “consultant” is brought in by a law enforcement agency, based on some enhanced knowledge or skill possessed by said civilian, thereby magically improving the agency’s crime solving abilities.  Amongst this subclass, I am a religious viewer of Psych, The Mentalist, Castle, White Collar, Fringe, and Bones (I can’t stand this one, to be honest, but it’s my wife’s favorite), to name a few.  With varying degrees of success, each of these programs attempts to present a compelling dynamic between straight-laced cops and one or more outside-the-box thinkers, who presumably aren’t bound by the paradigm that you’re typical “G-man” occupies.  It’s a classic odd couple arrangement – rambunctious corner cutter plays off of an endearing straight man.  My issue lies with one particular outside-the-box solution that is floated again and again on these shows.

Read more...

SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 05, 2012

Bad Behavior has blocked 1587 access attempts in the last 7 days.